Toyota hybrid electric car versus a regular petrol car; Is it worth buying?

Let’s take similar Toyota hybrid electric and petrol Toyota Yaris models for example, both 5 seats, around 10 sec to 100km/h performance.
The Electric Prius C uses at least 3.9L per 100km. The Petrol Yaris Hatch uses around 5.7L per 100Km. The average drive away prices in Australia are $18.500AUD for the petrol car versus $28000AUD for the hybrid electric.
If I drive an average whooping 30,000 km per year I’ll use 1,170L in the electric Prius and 1,710L in the regular petrol Toyota. The Prius will bring me a savings of 540L in petrol. With the Australian price of petrol averaging 1.50$ per liter I will save only $810 per year. I’d have to drive the Prius for at least 11 years just to make the electric hybrid a worthwhile buy! Even when comparing the hybrid Toyota to a powerful, petrol thirsty and expensive hatch like the Honda Civic VTi-S (8L/100km — 30MPG, 104kW, 6.5 sec to 100km/h, $23000AUD drive away) I’d have to drive at least 3 years to break even on the purchase price difference of $5,000AUD. In reality, most people drive less than 30,000 km per year.
And that is not taking into account the extra expenses in maintenance of the electric system, like on batteries and the electric motor.
Maybe you just like showing off that you are saving the environment. But those obvious savings come at an unobvious price for Mother Nature. The problem is that you don’t see the other ends of your consumption chain. Because the global economy and currencies are hardwired to energy resources like oil and coal, every dollar you spend is actually paid by nature! So when you buy expensive electric cars you actually consume much more natural resources than you would buying a regular car. Therefore, in order to produce less carbon dioxide and reduce your ecological footprint, you simply have to earn and buy less!

co2 emissions — fraud

Fossil fuel consumption increased exponentially for the last thousand years. However, the limit of resources showing up sharply. From a system control theory, it is known that to suppress an exponential system response (to prevent osciliation, phase shift = end of life cycles, violence ) there should be exponentional feedback applied with at negative sign and at least the same parameter. A trivial example is a Frequency compensation.
 In simple terms – an aggressive «over consuming»  “progress” must be reverse with at least the same intensively. Then it will take an other thousand years to slow down. Linear limitation of one of the system parameters ( like a side effect — co2 ) will not make any difference at all !

It is like speeding 100mph towards the concrete wall and just thinking of taking a foot of the accelerator ! We do not even have brakes in our “vehicle” of progress. This vehicle is not design to stop (if ever designed at all). Closing a fuel pipe wont help ether).  I’d rather look for a safe turn or a catapult ! Like a mass suicide or something.

All this co2 talks – is just fraud in order earned extra global cash, extra jobs, and votes. Such global “maybe” subjects create public fear (similar to Sep11 scam) and escapism from other more serious local issues like health and education. Using fear to achieve something is actually a terrorism.

Humans on Earth today behave like 4 year-olds

Humans on Earth today behave like 4–year-old girls with a hundred-dollar bill to spend.

The little girl would waste all the money on chocolate or ice cream. She would eat sweets until she got very sick or even until it killed her. We too carelessly waste the Earth’s natural resources on attempts to satisfy our greed and lust. We keep on consuming shit until we get fat and sick. Then we buy other shit to try and balance it out.

So far, the human race is in a cycle of stuffing our guts to death! Why? Because we can, and we’re proud of it!! Little childish morons…

Parents would teach a girl to behave. Parents would explain consequences of bad behaviour. The human race does not have any parents to look after them, no matter how hard we try to believe in God, Aliens or other imaginary friends. We will do whatever we like until we run out of air and burn our arses on the global warming fry pan.

People do not like to admit the simple reason why we are on this Earth.

Life appeared on the border between the hot sun and cold space. The only reason we are here is to dissipate as much energy as we can. We are like a tornado born on the border between high and low temperatures.

Our arrogance and logic came from millions of years of monkey experience. The logic was originally designed to grab a banana on a tree and see the consequences of confrontation with powerful enemies. Our logic is not designed to see beyond the boundaries of our own experience.

The only reason why we are better than other animals is because we can predict the consequences of our actions and change our environment according those predictions. Human logic and hands can change the environment faster than any other animal. Thus, we dissipate energy much faster than anything alive on Earth.  Yes. Changing the environment and increasing entropy (=disorder, chaos) is our goal. Our motivations and goals are directed by entropy. The more we consume, the more we are increasing entropy – and the more successful we seem to ourselves. Entropy laws control our motivations. Our feelings are only a parameter of a chemical physical reaction and balancing in favour of these laws.

Nature tricks us. Its laws do not consider satisfying our feelings! Our deep motivations and understanding of right and wrong have directed us towards increasing entropy – not actually to satisfy the feelings themselves. Our positive feelings are just a side effect. Positive feelings are only indicators to a mountain physical-chemical reactions of life in order to continue the process of self destruction forever. It doesn’t have much to do with the world around us; nor does money, success, etc.

Positive emotions are only there to sustain chemical reaction that is life. That way we can be active and live longer in order to process more and spend more energy. The best of us not only dissipate the maximum energy in our lifetime but also we motivate others and use technology to dissipate a million times more energy than is needed for survival. The technocratic environment we have created is doing our job (to waste energy) better than we are. A feeling of wasting energy is bloody good. For example: riding a powerful car is a waste of bioorganic masses grown for billions of years.

We humans deserve to fry our arses on the fry pan created by our own short-sighted greed – global warming. In fact, this was the only purpose of our existence…